Talk:The Fifth Discipline

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles

Business Low‑importance

	Business portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Education Low‑importance

	Education portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Education, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of education and education-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EducationWikipedia:WikiProject EducationTemplate:WikiProject Educationeducation articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Systems Low‑importance

	Systems science portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Systems, which collaborates on articles related to systems and systems science.SystemsWikipedia:WikiProject SystemsTemplate:WikiProject SystemsSystems articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is within the field of Systems theory.

remove broken link

who is interested could still see it here. ----Erkan Yilmaz 23:15, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Restored. There were questions about notability so I restored this and a previously-removed "global" reference as well. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 20:33, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Notability is not an issue

An editor recently asked why this page doesn't violate WP:CSD#G11, which states that unambiguous advertising or promotion is not allowed on Wikipedia. The implication was that this article does not belong in the project.

I checked Google Scholar and this book has over 3700 citations. Even if those numbers are inflated by 100%, it's still over 1800 citations in Google Scholar, more than enough to put a heavy WP:BURDEN on anyone who claims the book does not meet WP:GNG or WP:BOOK. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 20:37, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment should be move to talk page?

The comment at Talk:The_Fifth_Discipline/Comments would be more appropriate here on the talk page, rather than on the banner comments. Jonpatterns (talk) 16:42, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment comment

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:The Fifth Discipline/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

This page seems to be confusing. The intro text is too short with respect to outline of the book chapters.

Last edited at 08:39, 18 December 2007 (UTC). Substituted at 08:07, 30 April 2016 (UTC)